Looking at
the resource industry, an investment in a commodity is usually an investment in
an asset with a continuously dwindling rate of return.
An
investment in innovation has the potential to yield a sustainable scalable rate
of return. Investing in innovation is an absolute and fundamental shift in the
Africa’s traditional business model.
Besides
structural change, another major issue for African economies is non-inclusive
growth. Resource-driven African states continue to fail to equally
redistribute returns from resources across their societies even in times of
high commodity prices. Given the poor historical trend of resource returns supporting
structural change, innovation provides a far greater opportunity to drive more
inclusive growth than the traditional resource-based business models. In this
regard, a memorable quote from the Economist magazine states that, “Africa’s
future is dependent on minds and not on mines”. This statement means that
capital is
arguably
more scalable through innovation than commodities. However, the question
whether innovation is really suited to the
developmental
environment and economic structure of African economies, remains. A major
contribution to structural imbalances on the continent is not just over
dependence on commodities but also the major imbalances between the
formal and informal economy. For example, the informal economy in Nigeria
is estimated to be as large as 75% of the formal economy. This is almost as big
as South Africa’s GDP. If large informal sectors across the continent could be
formalised through innovations such as electronic payments, the derived
positive economic externalities from this could to some extent insulate the
negative impact of volatile commodity prices on African countries. While the
continent may not have large innovation hubs like Silicon Valley.
Innovation
is critical for economic development, and African public institutions need to
play a greater role. Compared to Singapore and Korea and other emerging
economies heavily investing in R&D at state level, African states are still
not doing enough. R&D investment at state level remains insufficient and
besides direct investment into R&D most African states still have a long
way to go in developing the core infrastructure needed to stimulate innovation
at a globally competitive level. In the context of innovation driving
inclusion, the private sector is playing a major role. For instance in the
financial sector, innovation in the Information Technology (IT) sector in
recent years has enabled a large proportion of previously financially excluded
people
across
the continent to join the formal financial sector Although agreeing
with the importance of
innovation
for greater financial inclusion, companies such as those with a
traditional insurance distribution model have limited
their
client base to employed and higher-income consumers. Consequently, to scale up
distribution of their services and capture a wider client base, some companies
are looking to partner with Telco’s and Fintech companies, that can develop
innovative, and also pragmatic digital insurance service solutions in the
African markets context.
Trends and business models are driven at a more fundamental level by enablers (technology, internet, big data, regulation). For example, it is quite obvious that the development of mobile money, which in turn enables disruptors such as mobile network operators to enter the financial services sector, is fundamentally made possible by the wide adoption of mobile phones and the internet. However, one should note that the relationship between the enablers, trends and business models is multidirectional. For example, while internet penetration in Africa is still low, it is to some extent the rapid development of mobile internet-based business models that brings tremendous value to customers, that creates demand for smartphones and internet access.
Analyzing
the penetration rates of various services in Africa and other parts of the
world, such as mobile phone, internet, banking, etc., is key to understanding
the changes in the financial sector.
However,
various sources use widely diverging definitions of penetration ratios, making
it impossible to compare data. For example, banking penetration in one source
would be calculated by adjusting for multiple accounts for one individual,
while mobile phone penetration would adjust for multiple accounts. Or the ratio
would be calculated over the adult population in one case, but over the total
population in another one.
No comments:
Post a Comment